← DOOMRADAR
Geopolitics63 / 100 · Doom score

Trump said in 2026 the US could stay in Iran and keep its oil

On Sept. 13, 2026, Donald Trump said the United States would leave Iran unless it decided to stay and keep Iranian oil, comparing the idea with Venezuela. He gave no operational plan, troop decision or oil agreement.

By DoomRadar · Published on DoomRadar . Updated .

Geographic context

Places in the report

United States of America, Venezuela, IranTanzaniaWestern SaharaCanadaUnited States of AmericaKazakhstanUzbekistanDemocratic Republic of the CongoSomaliaKenyaSudanChadHaitiDominican RepublicRussiaThe BahamasMexicoBrazilPeruColombiaPanamaCosta RicaNicaraguaHondurasEl SalvadorGuatemalaBelizeVenezuelaGuyanaSurinameFranceEcuadorPuerto RicoJamaicaCubaSenegalMaliMauritaniaBeninNigerNigeriaCameroonTogoGhanaIvory CoastGuineaGuinea-BissauLiberiaSierra LeoneBurkina FasoCentral African RepublicRepublic of the CongoGabonEquatorial GuineaBurundiIsraelLebanonPalestineThe GambiaTunisiaAlgeriaJordanUnited Arab EmiratesQatarKuwaitIraqOmanIndiaPakistanAfghanistanTajikistanTurkmenistanIranSyriaArmeniaBelarusUkrainePolandAustriaHungaryMoldovaRomaniaGermanyBulgariaGreeceTurkeyAlbaniaCroatiaSwitzerlandLuxembourgBelgiumNetherlandsPortugalSpainIrelandItalyUnited KingdomAzerbaijanGeorgiaSloveniaSlovakiaCzech RepublicEritreaYemenSaudi ArabiaTurkish Republic of Northern CyprusCyprusMoroccoEgyptLibyaEthiopiaDjiboutiSomalilandUgandaRwandaBosnia and HerzegovinaNorth MacedoniaSerbiaMontenegroKosovoTrinidad and TobagoSouth SudanUnited StatesVenezuelaIran

Countries named in the cited reporting. Highlighting does not show the area affected. Map: Natural Earth.

How the effects could reach youConditional effectsConditional impact diagram. Reported development: Trump said in 2026 the US could stay in Iran and keep its oil. energy: Energy-policy uncertainty could complicate decisions by firms exposed to Iranian oil or regional supply routes. Only if: The administration converts the statement into a formal policy or agreement. security: The prospect of a prolonged US presence could sustain uncertainty for people and businesses operating around the conflict. Only if: US forces remain or their role expands after any future settlement. These are possible effects, not probabilities or a forecast.
A possible pathway, conditional on the factors shown.Reported basis: [1][2]

Based on two sources with available article excerpts. Source-linked claims are not independent confirmation.

Event date: Trump made the statement on Sept. 13, 2026, while speaking to reporters in Doonbeg, Ireland. [1][2]

What happened

Trump said the United States would ultimately leave Iran unless it decided to stay and keep the oil, comparing the possible approach with what he described as Washington’s handling of Venezuela. The statement did not specify a timetable or implementation mechanism. [1][2]

References for this detail (2)

The Epoch Times reported that Trump did not elaborate on a possible oil agreement with Iran or say whether he would be willing to deploy troops in the country. The White House had not immediately responded to a request for comment on Sept. 13. [2]

References for this detail (1)

Trump also said US revenue from Venezuela had paid for the war many times over and said the price of gas would drop sharply once the Iran war ended. Those remarks described his expectations, not a confirmed change in fuel prices or a completed settlement. [2]

References for this detail (1)

The remarks were made during an ongoing US-Iran war that the reporting dated to Feb. 28, 2026, when a joint offensive with Israel began. The same account linked the conflict to severe restrictions or closure of the Strait of Hormuz, but did not establish that Trump’s oil statement changed the strait’s operational status. [1]

References for this detail (1)

Context from the sources

Trump’s comparison referred to Venezuela, where the reporting said US forces captured Nicolás Maduro on Jan. 3, 2026, and Washington then took control of part of the country’s energy sector while supporting Delcy Rodríguez as interim president. [1]

By the end of August, Trump had announced what he called the largest oil deal in history, involving 17 Venezuelan oil fields, about 65 billion barrels of proven reserves and a 25-year term. Those figures describe the Venezuela comparison, not an Iranian agreement. [1]

Explore the sources and reporting timeline

2 source links · 2 domains

These counts describe the references, not independent confirmations. Different outlets can repeat the same original report.

Source timeline

Oldest to newest among the available source dates, not a chronology of the incident. Article publication dates come from the source; other recorded dates may reflect when a link was found.

  1. Article published: Sep 13, 2026, 6:57 PM UTC[2] Trump Says US Could Remain in Iran and Keep Oil, Similar to Deal With Venezuelatheepochtimes.comReferenced for: detail 2, detail 3, detail 4
  2. Article published: Sep 13, 2026, 9:05 PM UTC[1] Trump Suggests U.S. Might Exit Iran Unless Oil Control Mirrors Venezuela Strategycubaheadlines.comReferenced for: detail 1, detail 2, detail 5

Questions answered by the reporting

What did Trump say about leaving Iran?

He said the United States would ultimately leave unless it decided to stay and keep the oil, presenting continued presence and oil control as a possible choice rather than a confirmed operation. [1][2]

What this could mean for you

Energy bills

Energy-policy uncertainty could complicate decisions by firms exposed to Iranian oil or regional supply routes.

A possible US decision to remain in Iran and control oil would affect expectations about ownership, access and sanctions, but no mechanism was announced.

Reported basis: [2][1] · The possible effect is interpretation.

Depends on: The administration converts the statement into a formal policy or agreement.

Safety

The prospect of a prolonged US presence could sustain uncertainty for people and businesses operating around the conflict.

Trump linked leaving Iran to a possible decision to stay and keep oil, without specifying troop or withdrawal arrangements.

Reported basis: [2][1] · The possible effect is interpretation.

Depends on: US forces remain or their role expands after any future settlement.

Possible consequences, not a forecast. Their relevance depends on your location and the conditions above.

For your country

Choose a country to check how this event could affect you.

What changes the outlook

Risk increases if…

The administration announces a formal plan to remain in Iran, deploy troops or control Iranian oil without an agreed settlement.

The conflict or Strait of Hormuz restrictions continue while the US role remains undefined.

Pressure eases if…

Washington clarifies that the statement was not an operational policy and publishes a withdrawal or settlement framework.

A negotiated agreement establishes the US role and resolves the oil and Strait of Hormuz questions.

Still unclear

Whether the statement reflected a settled administration policy or an exploratory position is unclear.

No Iranian response, US implementation plan or confirmed oil arrangement was established in the available reporting.

Market implications

Market impact

Loading market analysis...
Sources (2)

References for the reported details. Separate links do not necessarily mean independent confirmation.

First tracked by DoomRadar: . AI-assisted analysis · . Based on linked headlines and available excerpts. Methodology · Report an error.